Off-topic chat. May contain offensive language or images.
User avatar
By Uglybob
#49881
were they not gary glitter jokes?
User avatar
By Chief Erf
#49882
very erm contraversial if probably true, he does seem like that kinda guy. (alledgedlly)
User avatar
By Mcqueen_
#49883
How long till this gets moved into Private....
User avatar
By Uglybob
#49884
well everyone thought he was gay, probably even his wife. Thats why people couldnt believe he was married with kids. Its highly dubious at the moment, its sort of wait and see before anything else comes out (no pun intended).
By Lew
#49885
what has happened with british t.v presenters these days?

theakston, leslie, deayton, ulrika and now matthew kelly.

whos going to be presenting on the t.v now?
User avatar
By Chief Erf
#49886
dermot o'leary
By Bridgie
#49887
i hope this doesnt get moved or edited, its only a joke.
By David
#49894
they are quite funny.

Replace 'quite' with 'very'
By Dopey
#49898
Tonight mathew I'm going to be ... arested

(Sorry only some harmless fun)
User avatar
By Gaspode_The_Wonder_Dog
#49913
MiniMaximus wrote:theakston, leslie, deayton, ulrika and now matthew kelly.


ok its a bit unfair to theakston, deayton an ulrika (who did nothing illegal - in fact she helped in stan collymores fall from grace so thats a bonus) to include them with an alleged rapist and an alleged child abuser
User avatar
By Adam
#49924
oh dear me. why do people think these are funny, when actually they aren't? i don't agree with these jokes, especially when there are quiet possibily young children looking at this message board. chris moyles has fans of all ages, to actually post jokes on alleged child abuser is not right. there not funny, full stop. bridgie - i'd expect better from you.

matthew kelly could be gay, so what. he actually has the chin and smile of a certain popidol winner of the name will young, which is oddly scary.

i'm surprised that this has actually remained on the board, where are these so called moderators?
Last edited by Adam on Tue Jan 21, 2003 11:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By Nablo.
#49925
Doing a slack job. I thought Other than Chris they can't delete post or so thats what part of the conditions for the new moderators is.
User avatar
By Adam
#49927
Image

this looklike better watch his back. the mum's and dad's will be after kelly.

scary
User avatar
By Adam
#49928
Nablo the White wrote:Doing a slack job. I thought Other than Chris they can't delete post or so thats what part of the conditions for the new moderators is.


okay, so this can be moved to a safer place, then ignored.
User avatar
By Sam
#49934
Look at where the modarators are at the top of the board, there are none at the moment apart from Chris I think.
User avatar
By Sidders
#49971
I don't find it funny either. What happened to innocent until prooven guilty. That's the problem with the British media at the minute, so eager to pounce on anyone who' even slightly famous. But then it's our fault for reading it I suppose.
User avatar
By Adam
#49994
things like that sell newspapers. jokes however don't
By Bridgie
#49996
Sidla wrote:What happened to innocent until prooven guilty.


arent you forgetting this sidla :lol:

Sidla wrote:Let's not puss y-foot around. We all know it's bob.


but you didnt prove anything there
User avatar
By MK Chris
#50013
I support Bridgie on this one. Maybe an error of judgement to put it in General, but other than that they are very funny (even if a lot of them are the same old one's wheeled out again from the glitter revelations.)
By Bridgie
#50014
.
Last edited by Bridgie on Thu Mar 25, 2021 6:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By Sidders
#50062
Bridgie wrote:
Sidla wrote:What happened to innocent until prooven guilty.


arent you forgetting this sidla :lol:

Sidla wrote:Let's not puss y-foot around. We all know it's bob.


but you didnt prove anything there

Ok, I admit, I didn't prove that Bob was moderator, but I had seen sufficient evidence to make it clear in my mind that he was. On the other hand, I have seen NO evidence to suggest that Matthew Kelly is guilty.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#50065
But to be fair, the jokes will come out in much more public places than this. He will be caned on have I got news for you (actually, not sure if that series has stopped, but if it hasnt.)

the point is that it is now public knowledge that he was arrested and he isn't trying to hide it like john leslie. he is even playing the victim, so he is either trying to deal with a false allegation like a decent person might or making us think he is the victim in all this, which could be very clever. we will have to wait and see.

i think jokes are a way of dealing with grievances, they make things seem less serious than they are.
User avatar
By Sidders
#50069
Not really, since the jokes are about Matthew abusing kids. It may be true, it may not, but joking about serious allegations that may not be true is not really very funny.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#50070
OK, well I disagree, I think that he knows what is coming to him, whether he did it or not and that he is well aware of the jokes that will be going around. As I said, it as an error of judgement putting it in General, but other than that I don't see anything wrong with what Bridgie did.

Maybe it's me, I know I'm bloody hard to offend anyway