neilt0 wrote:One year on and Chris is still not back on the radio or doing a podcast. He is sitting at home, yelling at flies.
Bas wrote:She's the Tina Daheley of chrismoyles.net
Deadly wrote:Topher wrote:Stuff about Thatcher....
You are a disgrace and I'm looking forward to when someone you respect dies so I can rub your liberal face in it.
Charlalottie on Twitter wrote:Just remembered that I played pool with a satanist last night. Really should go out on a Friday more often.
Charlalottie wrote:Had a good night last night. We lost the pub quiz but had my hair plaited by a viking.
Yudster wrote:Might have something to do with the fact that she has been in Australia for the last few months. Hard to speculate on a relationship in those circumstances. I kind of hope it IS true. I have no idea why though.
Badger Mark wrote:Yudster wrote:Might have something to do with the fact that she has been in Australia for the last few months. Hard to speculate on a relationship in those circumstances. I kind of hope it IS true. I have no idea why though.
It's weird going back and listening to all the old shows on replay. I just finished 2004, and it always sounds weird to hear Chris talk about Sophie and what they were doing together. It makes me a little sad whenever she comes up because I know eventually the relationship was going to collapse years later. They seemed to really belong to each other just based upon what I heard on the show. In contrast, listening to Dave talk about his 1st wife, it was clear (in hindsight) that THAT marriage was doomed to failure.
swaddon1903 wrote:Badger Mark wrote:Yudster wrote:Might have something to do with the fact that she has been in Australia for the last few months. Hard to speculate on a relationship in those circumstances. I kind of hope it IS true. I have no idea why though.
It's weird going back and listening to all the old shows on replay. I just finished 2004, and it always sounds weird to hear Chris talk about Sophie and what they were doing together. It makes me a little sad whenever she comes up because I know eventually the relationship was going to collapse years later. They seemed to really belong to each other just based upon what I heard on the show. In contrast, listening to Dave talk about his 1st wife, it was clear (in hindsight) that THAT marriage was doomed to failure.
Way to spoil it for those of us listening from the start...
Badger Mark wrote:In contrast, listening to Dave talk about his 1st wife, it was clear (in hindsight) that THAT marriage was doomed to failure.
neilt0 wrote:Badger Mark wrote:In contrast, listening to Dave talk about his 1st wife, it was clear (in hindsight) that THAT marriage was doomed to failure.
What makes you say that?
The Deadly wrote:I'm pretty sure a lot/everything that they said about their partners was for comedy affect.
Badger Mark wrote:The Deadly wrote:I'm pretty sure a lot/everything that they said about their partners was for comedy affect.
I agree to a point. And some of Dave's comments were for comic affect. But I also think there was an underlying ring of truth to everything that he said regardless of how it was being used in the context of the show.
neilt0 wrote:..., I don't think we can draw any conclusions from the lack of exposition.