- Thu Feb 28, 2013 8:14 am
#492623
Interesting thought; almost like a "gardening leave" scenario. However, I would have thought that for that to have happened, they would have to pay Chris some sort of retainer (even though he was a freelancer) otherwise he could claim for loss of earnings/restraint of trade etc.
If that is the case, I can't believe the BBC Trust will allow that to continue for too long; they have been blasted in the past for ridiculous expenditure, so to be paying someone to do nothing would be another stick to which they could be beaten.
Isn't it about time one of them wrote their autobiography?
If that is the case, I can't believe the BBC Trust will allow that to continue for too long; they have been blasted in the past for ridiculous expenditure, so to be paying someone to do nothing would be another stick to which they could be beaten.
Isn't it about time one of them wrote their autobiography?