The place where everyone hangs out, chats, gossips, and argues
#482536
So moylesisagod is definitely chrisjames' new account.

Title of the thread is wrong as its not going to be a daily thing or even close to daily, and there's unnecessary punctuation but it's still well meaning enough to be a decent contribution. Classic CJ.
User avatar
By a-moron
#482543
wireman2004 wrote:i was actually wandering...


Aw c'mon. Yer ripping the pish now aren't you?

Wandering? * wandering! Away and take a long wander in the woods, no need to hurry back.
Or remember what path you took.
#482544
Yes, Chris banned him. He kept threatening to leave so Chris decided to make it easy for him. However it seems that he couldn't stay away even then.
#482550
Yes, but the IPs don't match. People can easily post from a different IP, home/college/work/mobile etc.
User avatar
By Yudster
#482561
Nic, can I borrow your snort? It seems very appropriate here!
#482564
You may indeed. Try to actually laugh with a snort as you type too, as I often do. It's attractive.

Oh also, interesting that there's been no "daily twitcast" today...
User avatar
By Yudster
#482565
*Snorts*!

Thanks Nic - here you go, I've washed it before I gave it back.
User avatar
By a-moron
#482594
Image


I personally think he's an antagonist, bull-shitter and a complete Bedford (although I quite liked DaveBedford) and if you allow him back into the fold I will never breathe the same air as you people ever again (or some other bullshit).

Dick.
#482595
If cruelty was allowed here we could do a poll to decide his new user name and give members the ability to edit all of his posts. Another idea would be to have a Chris James amnesty. We get all the hate out of our systems in one go, tell him how we really feel and then be nice to him until he * up.

Luckily it's not like that here...
User avatar
By a-moron
#482615
I couldn't really give a cat's * if he's allowed back or not.
Just enjoy the opportunity to have a wee outburst now and again.

Just tell what name he's going under if he's allowed back and I'll stick him back on the foes list.
#482631
ianpwilliams wrote:I've never really understood what the problem is with him. But then maybe I've not been around enough non-radio archive threads to be antagonized by it. But if it was my choice I would just leave him to it, as long as he obeyed the rules.


It's more that when he used to post, it got a very visceral reaction from some board members, as his posts used to be very obviously inflammatory in a subtle way.

I just stuck him on my foes list (like badger), only time it irritated me was the constant starting of new threads.

Sat and today are up