Off-topic chat. May contain offensive language or images.
User avatar
By dimtimjim
#472288
Nicola_Red wrote:But just cos it's easy for a woman to get sex, why should she be criticised for doing it? I don't understand this reasoning at all.


Please remember my criticism was aimed at a 12/13 year old spreading it round. Don't think anyone else has commented as such... Don't be so defensive.

Deadly wrote:What's considered rubbish?


Anything over 30 seconds and you're a stud...! :wink:
User avatar
By James H
#472289
DTJ: Not just females that animosity can apply to though. I know loads of guys who were massive c-bombs to me at school, it is SO satisfying to see them struggling now.

charlalottie wrote:For a ridiculous amount of Tesco stores I beat you all. 20 in a five mile area from my flat.

Wow, I didn't realise how many Tescos you can cram into a 5 mile postcode, I can't quite beat that, but I count 11 within 5 miles of my house!

Image
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#472290
dimtimjim wrote:
Nicola_Red wrote:But just cos it's easy for a woman to get sex, why should she be criticised for doing it? I don't understand this reasoning at all.


Please remember my criticism was aimed at a 12/13 year old spreading it round. Don't think anyone else has commented as such... Don't be so defensive.


That's a different thing, but still not a reason to shame someone. Sorry, I just hate that notion and I'll defend women against such categorisation whenever I think I need to.
User avatar
By Yudster
#472291
Nicola_Red wrote:
dimtimjim wrote:Please remember my criticism was aimed at a 12/13 year old spreading it round. Don't think anyone else has commented as such... Don't be so defensive.


That's a different thing, but still not a reason to shame someone. Sorry, I just hate that notion and I'll defend women against such categorisation whenever I think I need to.


If its not shameful, what is it?

And - I think you're defending yourself, not "women". I'm happy to have my corner fought for me by someone with women's interests and women's freedom at heart, but I'm not in the same corner as you Nic. You probably need to be nominated before you appoint yourself spokeswoman for a gender.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#472293
Yudster wrote:
Nicola_Red wrote:
dimtimjim wrote:Please remember my criticism was aimed at a 12/13 year old spreading it round. Don't think anyone else has commented as such... Don't be so defensive.


That's a different thing, but still not a reason to shame someone. Sorry, I just hate that notion and I'll defend women against such categorisation whenever I think I need to.


If its not shameful, what is it?


If you're speaking generally, it's nobody's business. If you're speaking about a 12 yr old child, it's clearly a bad thing, but still no reason to shame a child who doesn't fully understand the consequences of their actions.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#472294
Yudster wrote:I'm happy to have my corner fought for me by someone with women's interests and women's freedom at heart, but I'm not in the same corner as you Nic. You probably need to be nominated before you appoint yourself spokeswoman for a gender.


Sorry, double post. We're in the same corner in that we're both female. You may not choose to sleep with anyone, what I speak for is your right to do it if you so choose without being named for it. That's the very definition of freedom.
User avatar
By Yudster
#472295
Nicola_Red wrote:
Yudster wrote:I'm happy to have my corner fought for me by someone with women's interests and women's freedom at heart, but I'm not in the same corner as you Nic. You probably need to be nominated before you appoint yourself spokeswoman for a gender.


Sorry, double post. We're in the same corner in that we're both female. You may not choose to sleep with anyone, what I speak for is your right to do it if you so choose without being named for it. That's the very definition of freedom.


I have never struggled to obtain or be granted that freedom - as such, wading in to defend it on my behalf is inappropriate.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#472296
Alright, alright. So you've slept with whoever you want without being judged. You're lucky. But such a narrow definition of freedom is extremely selfish. I'm very lucky in that I've never had to worry or defend myself against the possibility of female circumcision, but that doesn't mean I won't fight for the rights of other women to be able to make that choice. Just saying "but that doesn't apply to me" doesn't mean I'm somehow 'in a different corner'.
User avatar
By dimtimjim
#472297
Can

O

Worms.
User avatar
By Yudster
#472299
Nicola_Red wrote:Alright, alright. So you've slept with whoever you want without being judged. You're lucky. But such a narrow definition of freedom is extremely selfish. I'm very lucky in that I've never had to worry or defend myself against the possibility of female circumcision, but that doesn't mean I won't fight for the rights of other women to be able to make that choice. Just saying "but that doesn't apply to me" doesn't mean I'm somehow 'in a different corner'.


No - missed point - not surprising as it wasn't particularly well made. I will join you firmly in your corner to fight for women to be freed from "cultural" mutilation etc. But in the liberated and liberal UK, the freedom to state that you find promiscuity distasteful is the one that has been eroded.

I am not in any way attempting to "educate" or alter your views Nic, I'm just not validating them. And if you perceive a judgement in all that, well, to coin a phrase, feel free!

And Foot Loose is looking great for his holidays isn't he?!
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#472300
Hmm. I'm not sure I entirely agree, but I understand what you mean better now. And yeah, haven't seen that pic in a while!
User avatar
By dimtimjim
#472304
nice to know its not just me picturing these two mud-wrestling*...! :wink:


* not really, thats sexist.
User avatar
By Yudster
#472305
I don't do mud.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#472306
Me neither. Too worried about my hair.
User avatar
By a-moron
#472307
dimtimjim wrote:nice to know its not just me picturing these two mud-wrestling*...! :wink:


Eew.
User avatar
By a-moron
#472315
dimtimjim wrote:A man who has slept with 50 girls is a hero.


SUPER-BADGE!!!

If only they'd had sex with me.
User avatar
By dimtimjim
#472316
theflyingbadger wrote:Eew.


You, of all people, have imagined worse...! :D
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#472318
Should I be offended that the thought of me mud-wrestling makes him go 'ew'?...
User avatar
By Yudster
#472320
Oh go on, be offended, You know you want to.
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#472323
Yep, now I think of it, obviously all men must be aroused at the very notion of my existence!
  • 1
  • 429
  • 430
  • 431
  • 432
  • 433
  • 559