Travis Bickle wrote:theflyingbadger wrote:Travis Bickle wrote:Your idea of constructive criticism is dishing out insults and a abuse, so you are in no position to talk.
Not one to stick up for the duck here (he's big enough and ugly enough to do that himself) but can't really recall him being an abuser or an insulter.
Thick as shit and wrong as hell about most things but not an abuser.
I was referring to an abusive post to another member that was deleted by Nicola last night
That is where we differ ol 'TB. If someone called me a moany * I wouldn't think of it as abuse. More 'constructive criticism'.
DevilsDuck wrote:theflyingbadger wrote:Travis Bickle wrote:Your idea of constructive criticism is dishing out insults and a abuse, so you are in no position to talk.
Not one to stick up for the duck here (he's big enough and ugly enough to do that himself) but can't really recall him being an abuser or an insulter.
Thick as shit and wrong as hell about most things but not an abuser.
Ta
No problem buddy.
SAV1OUR wrote:Shame people start commenting on the show in a generic fashion, when in fact this thread evolved from some acute observations made by other thread-starters.
Starts to look a lot like:
"Its brilliant"
Or
"Its meh"- these comments only scratch the surface. A lot of references to some mp3 player game I vaguely remember but I prefer the radio gems that aren't planned and get clipped. Maybe that's the positive to come out of all this? Who cares if certain features get kicked in the long grass, unpredicability is a good thing.
Where's the link gone? Nobody knows.
What a pernickety wee * thing to say.
DevilsDuck wrote:I wrote a new award show at xmas, but i decided you guys didn't deserve it.
I hope this doesn't offend anyone
It offended me. I would've spunked over all before me. * you Duck. * you deeply.
chrismoyles.net
