The place where everyone hangs out, chats, gossips, and argues
User avatar
By S4B
#382957
foot-loose wrote:
S4B wrote:I is drunk and fed up with stoopid people! Some of them are stoopid Foots ad some are just winding me up but as you say it doesn't really matter as it's all just winding me up.

CHRIS IS NOT BEING SACKED
HE DOES HAVE A LOT TO SAY
HE HAS TWEETED THAT HE HAS A LOT TO SAY
SCUM JOURNOS SHOULD BE SHOT AT BIRTH!

The end

You forgot the link.

http://www.twitter.com/CHRISDJMOYLES



*Has more wine so no longer cares!*
User avatar
By Mugs
#382959
S4B wrote:SCUM JOURNOS SHOULD BE SHOT AT BIRTH!

The end


To be fair they don't really know that they're going to be Journo's until at least Secondary school. So shooting people at birth you suspect are jounos is a little extreme :D :D :D
User avatar
By S4B
#382960
I don't think so Mugs. It would cut down on the number of idiots there are in the world. Plus I am only referring to people who will become Scum/Daily Fail/Screws up the World Journos so the number of people I would actually shoot is fairly small.
User avatar
By Andy B
#382980
Anyone know who sings that song about the Truck Driver? Not the Lorry Driver one, the one about Aled's (now ex) boyfriend.
User avatar
By Yudster
#382988
C-Kay wrote:Stop perving

You do realise who you are talking to? NEVER gonna happen.
By tina11
#382990
KewSonny wrote:Just to follow up on a couple of posts, why is Scott Mills suppossed to know everything about this? Who the hell has he suddenly become if this is true? Is this what the BBC has really come to?
PS Am i the only one that thinhs Scott Mills is a complete tool, I know he has be doing all he can to get this slot but this is too much


Firstly, if you actually read the previous posts regarding Scott Mills properly, you might realise that they were pointing out that the 'actual' Scott Mills has made no public comment whatsoever over this 'storm in a teacup'.

Secondly, I'm all for constructive criticism, but simply stating 'Scott Mills is a complete tool' without plenty of evidence to back up your rather childish comment isn't a particularly impressive forum contribution.

Thirdly, I honestly don't think Scott covets the Breakfast Show in any way shape or form, no matter how much his salary might increase. He'd lose far too much beauty sleep and would have to cut down to just the one bottle of wine a day. Seriously though, I think he does realise it wouldn't suit him or the majority of Moyles' fans. I'm very happy for Chris and Scott to remain precisely where they are at the moment thank you.

Lastly, I am really looking forward to Moyles totally and utterly trouncing that idiot from The Sun on tomorrow morning's show. Goodness. It'll give him material for AT LEAST three and a half hours. Hehe.
User avatar
By Yudster
#382991
tina11 wrote:Secondly, I'm all for constructive criticism, but simply stating 'Scott Mills is a complete tool' without plenty of evidence to back up your rather childish comment isn't a particularly impressive forum contribution.

Since when has anyone, here or anywhere else, needed to provide evidence and justification for a personal opinion? That said, the evidence is on show for all to hear, every weekday, 4pm to 7pm on Radio 1.
User avatar
By S4B
#382992
Yudster wrote:
tina11 wrote:Secondly, I'm all for constructive criticism, but simply stating 'Scott Mills is a complete tool' without plenty of evidence to back up your rather childish comment isn't a particularly impressive forum contribution.

Since when has anyone, here or anywhere else, needed to provide evidence and justification for a personal opinion? That said, the evidence is on show for all to hear, every weekday, 4pm to 7pm on Radio 1.



OOOH sharp!

Yuds is on fire!
By tina11
#382993
Yudster wrote:
tina11 wrote:Secondly, I'm all for constructive criticism, but simply stating 'Scott Mills is a complete tool' without plenty of evidence to back up your rather childish comment isn't a particularly impressive forum contribution.

Since when has anyone, here or anywhere else, needed to provide evidence and justification for a personal opinion? That said, the evidence is on show for all to hear, every weekday, 4pm to 7pm on Radio 1.

I don't know. I'm perhaps in 'teacher mode', but I do feel that backing up an opinion with reasons merely makes it far more interesting to read, and seem less like meaningless abuse.
Last edited by tina11 on Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
By tina11
#382995
S4B wrote:Tina we've backed it up with reasons on many occasions, we just can't be bothered to go into them again.

Fair enough. I can't help being a big fan of both Scott and Chris. I do think it's a shame the two appear to be mutually exclusive on this site. That's all.
User avatar
By S4B
#382997
Well this is the Chris Moyles fan site. You could always join UM if you want to be nice about Scott. Although some on here like him too.........

*looks for Andy B*
By Chas
#383006
I have heard Scott a few times and i like the guy(His meeting with animals a few weeks ago was one of the funniest things i've heard all year) but not a patch on Chris. Scott is certainly not a tool though.

It will be fireworks tomorrow but i won't probably wake up till about 8 but as has been said, Chris will probably keep the media-hate material going through the whole show.
  • 1
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 17