The place where everyone hangs out, chats, gossips, and argues
By wireman2004
#370708
for the first time since the podcasts were brought out. There is no new podcast. I for one am disappointed in the bbc for not alowing chris too do any podcast. As chris mentioned in the 1 minute he did explain too us.

So thank you bbc for not giving us a podcast. That some people have had every one so destroy back catalogues.
User avatar
By SAV1OUR
#370710
They should've just left the 12 month ones up.
By wireman2004
#370711
i would of personally like the ones where it is completely new material. They are always funny. When they did the ask the team feature about one real and one fake fact. And where they played games as well.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#370712
wireman2004 wrote:That some people have had every one so destroy back catalogues.

I've become somewhat used to reading most of your barely legible drivel, but this has me stumped.... what on earth are you on about?!
By wireman2004
#370713
the fact that for the first time since the podcasts came out. The bbc have not alowed a new podcast too be produced. I look forward too my 40 minutes of laughter each friday.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#370714
I understand that, but what the hell is that bit that I quoted? About destroying back catalogues?
By wireman2004
#370716
Topher wrote:I understand that, but what the hell is that bit that I quoted? About destroying back catalogues?

You destroy the back catalogues because if you have a weekly podcast for 3 and a half years. Then for no reason. For supposed legal reasons. They don't do one after 3 and a half years. The bbc don't actually care about what we think and want. WON'T your back catalogue look wired if mysteriously a week was missing.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#370717
But it's missing because there isn't one... you still have your back catalogue and you still have every one that was ever recorded (if you did previously.) Anyway, by the sounds of it, there is a one minute audio file explaining the gap in the void, so at least there's something you can put in its place.

By the way, I would suggest you learn when it's appropriate to start a new sentence and when it would be better to just use a comma.
User avatar
By Console
#370719
wireman2004 wrote:
Topher wrote:I understand that, but what the hell is that bit that I quoted? About destroying back catalogues?

You destroy the back catalogues because if you have a weekly podcast for 3 and a half years. Then for no reason. For supposed legal reasons. They don't do one after 3 and a half years. The bbc don't actually care about what we think and want. WON'T your back catalogue look wired if mysteriously a week was missing.


That's a good point; I mean, imagine if you brushed your teeth twice a day, everyday for three and a half years. Then, for no reason, you don't brush your teeth once after three and a half years. You obviously don't care about the state of your teeth. Won't your teeth look horrible now, there's no point going on with brushing them; hell, you may as well pull all of your teeth out.
User avatar
By Zoot
#370720
Console wrote:That's a good point; I mean, imagine if you brushed your teeth twice a day, everyday for three and a half years. Then, for no reason, you don't brush your teeth once after three and a half years. You obviously don't care about the state of your teeth. Won't your teeth look horrible now, there's no point going on with brushing them; hell, you may as well pull all of your teeth out.


Aww, we've all missed you Console!
By in4308
#370721
wireman2004 wrote:for the first time since the podcasts were brought out. There is no new podcast. I for one am disappointed in the bbc for not alowing chris too do any podcast. As chris mentioned in the 1 minute he did explain too us.

So thank you bbc for not giving us a podcast. That some people have had every one so destroy back catalogues.


I dont get what your complaining about really......Theres no podcast because there has been no show, simple.

Why start the New year with a best of from 2008, most of which was done on new years day!
By wireman2004
#370722
but they could do the completely new material that they had for 2 weeks in 2006. I enjoyed them when they did the guessing game and the other one where they had too bring games too the podcast.
I don't knowo who wouldn't let them even do that podcast. But even if they filled in the void like that.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#370724
Stop moaning, they haven't done one and there's nothing you can do about it. Worse things have happened at sea.
User avatar
By Bonanzoid
#370726
Wireman, please read up on the differences between to, too and two. For the love of all that is holy!
By in4308
#370731
Heres what Aled's written about it on his site, so read it and then enough is enough. There isn't a podcast this week. I'm sure you can manage to fill 40 mins of your time surely!

ALED:

The official line is somewhere inbetween. It's not that we're banned as such, but yes - there is a rule that we can only put in podcasts something that's been broadcast before.

Seeing as we have just done a 12 hour best of show with 12 Best of podcasts it was felt we couldn't top it. So we relented to having our first ever Podcast break. Not the best - but maybe right this time.



They would also have to broadcast the podcast if they made one which would meen the big comeback next week wouldent be so.......big.

AND...if you where on holiday would you want to go into work and start recording/working in your own time?
Last edited by in4308 on Fri Jan 09, 2009 5:18 pm, edited 4 times in total.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#370733
Bonanzoid wrote:Wireman, please read up on the differences between to, too and two. For the love of all that is holy!

I thought about mentioning this, but decided that if the contruction of sentences was such a challenge, something of that sort of difficulty would just be beyond him.
User avatar
By tom greeni
#370741
The Natzi style spelling and grammar partol are out, again!
User avatar
By MK Chris
#370744
'Nazi'.
User avatar
By Johnny 1989
#370748
wireman2004 wrote:for the first time since the podcasts were brought out. There is no new podcast. I for one am disappointed in the bbc for not alowing chris too do any podcast. As chris mentioned in the 1 minute he did explain too us.

So thank you bbc for not giving us a podcast. That some people have had every one so destroy back catalogues.


To be fair we did get 12 last week, on a Thursday so that more than makes up for this weeks one being missing.

Regarding Podcasts, how comes they no longer do the special "brand new materials" ones they did in 2006 or 2007 where they played loads of random games, don't tell me someone moaned about those :roll:
User avatar
By Yudster
#370752
I thought I had The Jam's entire back catalogue, but clearly all the albums they never made aren't in it, so it is sadly incomplete. I may have to throw it all away.
User avatar
By Zoot
#370754
When I was young, i developed spinal problems. The doctor suggested I may want a new artificial spine. They gave me a book full of the different kinds of spine that was on offer, so I could choose and order the one I wanted.
Unfortunately on the way home I dropped the book into a puddle.
So as you see, my back catalogue was also destroyed.

I'm here all week, try the veal.
User avatar
By Johnny 1989
#370757
I don't know what the op is talking about, I downloaded it, it's just a really, really, really short podcast & doesn't ruin your back catalogue at all :lol:
By in4308
#370763
Haha....Yeah i've just heard there little message on the podcast!
By in4308
#382036
Old topic but new idea....

Has anybody listened to this weeks podcast? Pretty much the whole 25 mins is just Aled. Then at the end there is a 5 min interview with Whoopi.

I diden't think their was a lack of material this week either....