Doctor Who? - Page 10 - chrismoyles.net forum

Reply

Re: Doctor Who?#348534

By MK Chris - Fri Jun 27, 2008 5:44 pm

- Fri Jun 27, 2008 5:44 pm #348534

S4B wrote:A. I watch it because I have to because my kids do - I would not do so by choice and would otherwise have to leave the room

S4B wrote:OK so I really enjoyed this week's episode but I am incredibly confused by the trail for next week's!! When did the Doctor have sex? Was there a triple X rated episode I missed about 16 years ago? Where did his daughter come from?

S4B wrote:GREAT episode this week! I need to watch it again to count how many Agatha Christie books were referenced in it as that made me laugh!

S4B wrote:LOVED it this week! My kids will never again do that stupid repeating everything you say thing. Hurrah!

S4B wrote:
Bruvva wrote:
Also, yay for Christina Rossetti references!

Console wrote: next weeks is looking to be a good one.

Seconded!

S4B wrote:Wow!!! Was a weird episode but..................... WHAT AN ENDING!?!!

WOW!

S4B wrote:NOOOO!!! Don't post any of them, I'm trying to avoid any talk of the next episode.

I know I could just not read this thread however I have that OCD thing about the orange blobs and I can't bring myself to do the Mark Forums Read thing - again blame the OCD!

Not to mention the fact that you started this thread..

Deadly wrote:
Topher wrote:Stuff about Thatcher....

You are a disgrace and I'm looking forward to when someone you respect dies so I can rub your liberal face in it.

Re: Doctor Who?#348539

By S4B - Fri Jun 27, 2008 5:56 pm

- Fri Jun 27, 2008 5:56 pm #348539

I still HAVE to watch it! Also I knew it would please Bruvva and you know how I LOVE to please him!

Re: Doctor Who?#348541

By foot-loose - Fri Jun 27, 2008 5:57 pm

- Fri Jun 27, 2008 5:57 pm #348541

Topher wrote:
S4B wrote:A. I watch it because I have to because my kids do - I would not do so by choice and would otherwise have to leave the room

S4B wrote:OK so I really enjoyed this week's episode but I am incredibly confused by the trail for next week's!! When did the Doctor have sex? Was there a triple X rated episode I missed about 16 years ago? Where did his daughter come from?

S4B wrote:GREAT episode this week! I need to watch it again to count how many Agatha Christie books were referenced in it as that made me laugh!

S4B wrote:LOVED it this week! My kids will never again do that stupid repeating everything you say thing. Hurrah!

S4B wrote:
Bruvva wrote:
Also, yay for Christina Rossetti references!

Console wrote: next weeks is looking to be a good one.

Seconded!

S4B wrote:Wow!!! Was a weird episode but..................... WHAT AN ENDING!?!!

WOW!

S4B wrote:NOOOO!!! Don't post any of them, I'm trying to avoid any talk of the next episode.

I know I could just not read this thread however I have that OCD thing about the orange blobs and I can't bring myself to do the Mark Forums Read thing - again blame the OCD!

Not to mention the fact that you started this thread..

My word.

S4B. You have just been shafted.

... not for the first...

never mind.

Re: Doctor Who?#348553

By S4B - Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:18 pm

- Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:18 pm #348553

I give up! I watch it cos my kids do! Their enthusiasm is catching. Bruvva, however, frequents sites etc that make him a geek!

Oh and Foots, it's been a long time since I was shafted!

Re: Doctor Who?#348554

By Munki Bhoy - Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:18 pm

- Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:18 pm #348554

CassieJackson wrote:
Bruvva wrote:giddy with excitement.

This is a pretty good description of how it makes me feel too. I can't wait for tomorrow night.

I'm the same, but then I have a thing for Billie Piper so that makes me doubly... giddy. Even with her weird voice last week.

foot-loose wrote:Big * or no *, no "lol's" allowed. NEVA!

Re: Doctor Who?#348584

By Andy B - Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:03 pm

- Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:03 pm #348584

Oh my good god! How did no-one know about that? I was just getting used to David Tennant as well. What a cool episode. And why is Sarah Jane Smith married to a computer?

The Andyctionary wrote:Andy B: Very lazy, flirtatious person with wonderful hair who does not resemble prince charming. Very sarcastic so if something he posts seems stupid it's probably deliberate. Aspirations of global dictatorship so you'll probably first against the wall come the revolution.

Re: Doctor Who?#348585

By Munki Bhoy - Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:13 pm

- Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:13 pm #348585

To quote the Doctor himself of late...

What? What?! WHAT?!!!

David Tennant's down to do the specials next year! Something funny going on here...

foot-loose wrote:Big * or no *, no "lol's" allowed. NEVA!

Re: Doctor Who?#348588

By S4B - Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:25 pm

- Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:25 pm #348588

It better be someone equally as sexy! Could none of the geeks have warned us about this!? My kids are really upset!

Re: Doctor Who?#348590

By Console - Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:29 pm

- Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:29 pm #348590

Andy B wrote:And why is Sarah Jane Smith married to a computer?

They're not married, it's just named Mr Smith. It's also technically an alien - a Zylocke, some sort of crystaline alien.

S4B wrote:Could none of the geeks have warned us about this!?

There could be a very good reason why none of the 'geeks' have warned you about it.

Re: Doctor Who?#348592

By S4B - Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:36 pm

- Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:36 pm #348592

Console wrote:There could be a very good reason why none of the 'geeks' have warned you about it.

What do you know Console? What?! What??!! WHAT???!!!

Re: Doctor Who?#348593

By Console - Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:41 pm

- Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:41 pm #348593

This coming from the person that only watches it because her kids do?

Re: Doctor Who?#348594

By S4B - Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:45 pm

- Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:45 pm #348594

Well and also because he is HOT!!

*hangs head in shame*

You can't help but get caught up in it all, especially after that episode but I don't obsess about it.

Re: Doctor Who?#348595

By Munki Bhoy - Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:48 pm

- Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:48 pm #348595

Maybe the geeks just did not know...

foot-loose wrote:Big * or no *, no "lol's" allowed. NEVA!

Re: Doctor Who?#348596

By Console - Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:59 pm

- Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:59 pm #348596

S4B wrote:I don't obsess about it.

Ah good, you won't need me to tell you then.

Re: Doctor Who?#348598

By S4B - Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:11 pm

- Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:11 pm #348598

Console wrote:
S4B wrote:I don't obsess about it.

Ah good, you won't need me to tell you then.

Well it's not for me you understand, it's for my kids who are currently sobbing uncontrollably. Anything you can tell me to set their little minds at rest would be so wonderful.

Re: Doctor Who?#348602

By Munki Bhoy - Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:16 pm

- Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:16 pm #348602

My immediate suspicion is that because they're out of sync with the rest of the universe by that one second, the regeneration will be different from normal. It won't actually change the doctor. Either that or the TARDIS is just refuelling him, it's good that way.

Or, we'll get a new doctor. He's not one for staying dead. And a new doctor isn't necessarily a bad thing.

foot-loose wrote:Big * or no *, no "lol's" allowed. NEVA!

Re: Doctor Who?#348603

By S4B - Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:17 pm

- Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:17 pm #348603

Munki Bhoy wrote: And a new doctor isn't necessarily a bad thing.

You take that back!

Re: Doctor Who?#348605

By Munki Bhoy - Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:18 pm

- Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:18 pm #348605

S4B wrote:
Munki Bhoy wrote: And a new doctor isn't necessarily a bad thing.

You take that back!

I quite liked Christopher Eccleston. I was disappointed when he decided to leave. Then we got David Tennant, who has been brilliant! So the disappointment kinda filtered away in the end.

foot-loose wrote:Big * or no *, no "lol's" allowed. NEVA!

Re: Doctor Who?#348606

By Console - Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:20 pm

- Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:20 pm #348606

Munki Bhoy wrote:My immediate suspicion is that because they're out of sync with the rest of the universe by that one second, the regeneration will be different from normal.

A possibility, but not what I'd have gone with.

Munki Bhoy wrote:Either that or the TARDIS is just refuelling him, it's good that way.

He's regenerated several times in the TARDIS before, I doubt that it's refuelling him.

S4B wrote:Anything you can tell me to set their little minds at rest would be so wonderful.

I'm heartless enough to let them use this as a life experience.

Re: Doctor Who?#348608

By S4B - Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:37 pm

- Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:37 pm #348608

Console wrote:
S4B wrote:Anything you can tell me to set their little minds at rest would be so wonderful.

I'm heartless enough to let them use this as a life experience.

(This is from S4B junior x 2)

You are a mean man!

Re: Doctor Who?#348609

By Console - Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:41 pm

- Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:41 pm #348609

To be fair to me, you could have just read this thread to find the reason - I'm sure it's been mentioned a couple of times.

Re: Doctor Who?#348611

By Munki Bhoy - Sat Jun 28, 2008 9:24 pm

- Sat Jun 28, 2008 9:24 pm #348611

Console wrote:To be fair to me, you could have just read this thread to find the reason - I'm sure it's been mentioned a couple of times.

Just did, and no it hasn't. The only thing I found was Bruvva claiming regeneration at the end of the series and that the specials were a hoax. Bruvva them retracted that later on, pointing out that David Tennant was filming the Christmas special. Which brings us back round to the conclusion that this is no normal regeneration and it will still be David Tennant at the end of it.

foot-loose wrote:Big * or no *, no "lol's" allowed. NEVA!

Re: Doctor Who?#348612

By Console - Sat Jun 28, 2008 9:25 pm

- Sat Jun 28, 2008 9:25 pm #348612

That is the reason, the regeneration is meaningless, or at least will be rendered meaningless, as we know that Tennant will be in the Christmas special and numerous specials next year.