Off-topic chat. May contain offensive language or images.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#267134
Bit on the late side, but did anyone see the Masters final on Sunday?

Top bit of snooker! Felt sorry for Ding, because he played extremely well to get there and at that age it can't be easy to come to another country and get your arse kicked and a barrage of abuse on top of that.

Felt Ronnie redeemed himself from his walking out incident (which I thought he should have been banned for); not only did he play impeccably, but to take Ding under his wing like that showed true sportsmanship.

I guess not many people are interested, since snooker doesn't get a mention on here very often, but thought it was worth a go.
By Ballbag
#267137
I enjoyed it Topher, especially Ding's 147 the week before which I watched live. It makes all the difference than watching a replay of it because there's always the chance that he'd * it up.

The current Mrs Ballbag even watched it too, and she's in no way a fan of sport, but when he finally did it she was jumping about and screaming with the rest of us.

It truly was great stuff, then of course there was the darts final.......... there's nothing like a nail-biting day of minor sports.
By Ballbag
#267139
I enjoyed it Topher, especially Ding's 147 the week before which I watched live. It makes all the difference than watching a replay of it because there's always the chance that he'd * it up.

The current Mrs Ballbag even watched it too, and she's in no way a fan of sport, but when he finally did it she was jumping about and screaming with the rest of us.

It truly was great stuff, then of course there was the darts final.......... there's nothing like a nail-biting day of minor sports.
User avatar
By DcS
#267143
Yeah i watched it, Ding is a very good player and liek Ronnie said, he has the potential to become a Multi Champion, shame about the abuse Ding got in the final but very well played to Ronnie for looking after him and playing "alright" in his words.
User avatar
By foot-loose
#267145
I've never understood the facination with snooker.

My friends seem to love the game but I honestly can't understand what makes it so interesting.

I tend to have the same opinion of most sports that you watch on tv. I can understand the enjoyment in playing them, but I find watching sport boring!
User avatar
By MK Chris
#267147
Bag for balls wrote:I enjoyed it Topher, especially Ding's 147 the week before which I watched live. It makes all the difference than watching a replay of it because there's always the chance that he'd * it up.

Ah I didn't see that live, I saw the replay, but yeah you're right, it is better when you don't know what's going to happen.

As John Parrott (or Steve Davis, one of the two) said, they're that much harder to do if, as they were, the reds are all bunched up because you have to break them up during the break.

Bag for balls wrote:The current Mrs Ballbag even watched it too, and she's in no way a fan of sport, but when he finally did it she was jumping about and screaming with the rest of us.

Mrs Topher likes sport more than me, she was at the ice hockey with her sister. She got me a puck that flew into the crowd!

Bag for balls wrote:It truly was great stuff, then of course there was the darts final.......... there's nothing like a nail-biting day of minor sports.

Didn't see any of that, but I do like a bit of darts.

foot-loose wrote:I tend to have the same opinion of most sports that you watch on tv. I can understand the enjoyment in playing them, but I find watching sport boring!

I think snooker suffers (to a lesser extent) from the same problem as table tennis on TV; if a snooker player misses what looks like an easy shot, it's easy to slate him, but it's difficult to know what sort of spin he's trying to put on the ball to try and make the next shot. The same is true in table tennis, it's not particularly good for TV because the average Joe hasn't got a clue whether that was a side-spin, heavy topspin or backspin shot most of the time.

There's a hell of a lot of skill and tactical awareness required for both.
User avatar
By Yudster
#267175
I used to love snooker when it was first becoming high profile, back in the eighties - then Stephen Hendry came along and it was all down hill for a long time. However in the last year or two its really started looking up again, and I have enjoyed the last couple of televised tournaments a lot. I even like Stephen Hendry now he isn't such a bloody robot. Ronnie is wonderful, although as a person about as far from normal as you can get without people in white coats doing experiments on you. But given his background, I suppose its unsurprising. I love to watch him play.
User avatar
By foot-loose
#267178
the eighties? Are you like, a hundred years old?

;)
User avatar
By DemonHorse
#267180
Diffusionuk wrote:say what you like about the snooker, the title music is good :wink:


Yeah fantastic stuff that.

I can watch snooker without really getting bored of it. Also it's something I can watch with sound off and Itunes on in the background.

Multitaskingtastic.
User avatar
By Gaspode_The_Wonder_Dog
#267196
The crowd were ridiculous and spoiled it for me after every pot they were shouting. Get a grip.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#267198
Yeah the crowd did seem to think they were at a football match.
User avatar
By SAV1OUR
#267203
My cousin went to watch a game, he said if you behave like a bellend they dont use you for cutaway shots no more!
By Ballbag
#267218
foot-loose wrote:the eighties? Are you like, a hundred years old?

;)



Foot goose, I too remember the 80's and I can tell you I'm far from 100 years old........ I can't speak for Yudyud though... I think she's nearer there than me........... a fair bit nearer.



(by the way the 80's weren't that long ago)
User avatar
By Yudster
#267226
foot-loose wrote:the eighties? Are you like, a hundred years old?

;)


No. Are you stupid?
User avatar
By DcS
#267476
Jimmy White finally beat someone!! He is a Legend
User avatar
By DemonHorse
#267483
DcS wrote:Jimmy White finally beat someone!! He is a Legend


Ah he's changed his name back from Jimmy Brown then... that lame marketing gimmicky thing he did.
User avatar
By Yudster
#267496
foot-loose wrote:nah.


Didn't think so. My age is broadcast somewhere in these forums - I'm not telling everyone again! Suffice to say I have a 18 year old son, a 15 year old daughter, a three year old boy and a husband twelve and a half years younger than me. So you can understand how I might be confused about an appropriate maturity level for myself.
By Ballbag
#267504
Is the husband the father to your 18 year old?

If so then we can work out your "at least" age. Let's say that hubby became a father at the age of 18, (I know it could be earlier, but that's by the by) so, that was 18 years ago (son's age). So 18+18 gives hubby's current age, 36. Ergo you being 12 years older leads me to summise that you are at least (notice the at least) 48 years old.


(this theory is subject to the approximations made by Bfb and is null and void if the current Mr Yudster is not the biological pater of said 18 year old)
User avatar
By Yudster
#267516
No, he most definitely is NOT!!!!!!!!!!!! For so many, many reasons.......!
User avatar
By MK Chris
#267521
Is one of those reasons that your current husband wasn't born when you had your 18 year old?
User avatar
By foot-loose
#267543
even if her husband isn't the father of her child?


On a similar note: If you have a couple of chickens and a fox and you need to cross a river and the fox can only eat one chicken at a time, how many scorpions can you fit on the fox's back?
User avatar
By DemonHorse
#267565
charlalottie wrote:This is why I don't do maths! I'm going to end up with a mental breakdown trying to work out how to save the chickens and get a million scropions across a river whilst they use a fox as a boat.


You can't, unless you have a box or some kind of protection from the scorpions for the fox.... or alternatively the fox could be dead already and theyre using it's corpse as a boat.... or even the scorpions could be dead.