because their homes are destroyed and sending them back would be almost the same as sending the to their deaths?
just a thought.
Deadly wrote:Topher wrote:Stuff about Thatcher....
You are a disgrace and I'm looking forward to when someone you respect dies so I can rub your liberal face in it.
OldGit wrote:There seems to always be action against those that follow the law, for instance the discussion about refugees, a lot of talk about control of refugees and better assessing of possible immigrants, everyone seems to ignore the fact that there are still a lot of illegal immigrants coming into this country, I would like to see more focus on these.
Another example is 'Driver Bashing', a while ago i was pulled over for speeding, on an urban dual carraigeway doing 42 mph at nearly 4am on a dry moonlit night (not a club night, so no-one around) the police officer wnt through the usual routine (do you know what speed..........etc) then said do you realise an elderly man was knocked down and killed, "yes" i replied, "wasnt that by a stolen car though?" to which he said "i don't see that makes a difference, he WAS going at 30mph" "really!" i said, "why?"to cut a long story short, the driver had stolen the car, was driving at 30mph because he was being followed by a police patrol car (and no doubt staring at his mirror) and it was also the middle of the afternoon, the 'discussion' ended in him telling me that this was an "accident blackspot" and I must be careful. All too often drivers are being punished because of somebody acting outside of the law, and on this occasion the police officer was alone, therefore they are advised not to do anything but warn, I would probably have been booked otherwise.
DemonHorse wrote:OldGit wrote:There seems to always be action against those that follow the law, for instance the discussion about refugees, a lot of talk about control of refugees and better assessing of possible immigrants, everyone seems to ignore the fact that there are still a lot of illegal immigrants coming into this country, I would like to see more focus on these.
Another example is 'Driver Bashing', a while ago i was pulled over for speeding, on an urban dual carraigeway doing 42 mph at nearly 4am on a dry moonlit night (not a club night, so no-one around) the police officer wnt through the usual routine (do you know what speed..........etc) then said do you realise an elderly man was knocked down and killed, "yes" i replied, "wasnt that by a stolen car though?" to which he said "i don't see that makes a difference, he WAS going at 30mph" "really!" i said, "why?"to cut a long story short, the driver had stolen the car, was driving at 30mph because he was being followed by a police patrol car (and no doubt staring at his mirror) and it was also the middle of the afternoon, the 'discussion' ended in him telling me that this was an "accident blackspot" and I must be careful. All too often drivers are being punished because of somebody acting outside of the law, and on this occasion the police officer was alone, therefore they are advised not to do anything but warn, I would probably have been booked otherwise.
and what about people that break into your house, you're not allowed to even bloody challenge them or defend yourself or YOU end up getting sued and arrested when THEY are the 1s breaking and entering etc....
on that 1 I totally agree with the yanks take on it.
DemonHorse wrote:Tony Martin's reaction was entirely natural, no-one thinks to arrest the one trying to sue coz he shudnt have been there.
Mafro wrote:I agree , they shouldn't be in a position to be shot in the first place, i.e. on someone else's property robbing it.
Apparently you are allowed to use "reasonable force", which in my book means anything from a good slap to being shot to pieces.
Sidla wrote:Betti - Better than Viagra.