Off-topic chat. May contain offensive language or images.
#399501
The fat fighters/Marjorie Dawes/Little Britain thing, always makes me remember this diet:

Get whatever food you have, cut it in half.
It's now half the calories!
and because its half the calories, you can have twice as much!
#399527
Marjorie Dawes is funny though. The League of Gentlemen was not. Not in the slightest.

It irritates me that when I TELL people who liked it that I thought the League of Gentlemen was gash, they sort of look down on me in a "bless the little person who doesn't understand comedy" sort of way. Wankers.
User avatar
By Yudster
#399529
Beadle Poke wrote:Sorry to piss on your chips ladies, but you'll be back to your intended weight in no time. All that effort will be wasted once you cave in and accept you can't resist cream cakes. I've seen it 1000 times. It's a classic case, a classic scenario. Women are never happy with anything in life, least of all thier weight.

YOU WERE BORN TO BE FAT.

hey fatty bom bom sweet sugar dumpling.

I hope I will be back to my usual weight (I'm assuming that you didn't actually mean "intended" because that would make the whole of your post nonsensical). I've never been skinny, but I'm not a naturally fat person, I gained weight due to illness.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#399531
foot-loose wrote:Marjorie Dawes is funny though. The League of Gentlemen was not. Not in the slightest.

It irritates me that when I TELL people who liked it that I thought the League of Gentlemen was gash, they sort of look down on me in a "bless the little person who doesn't understand comedy" sort of way. Wankers.

Some of it was funny, not all - but I understand why some people don't like it.

That thing that was done by the same people that was on recently... Psychoville? That looked good, the one or two episodes I saw.
User avatar
By Yudster
#399533
I hated League of Gentlemen. Horrible, nasty vile stuff.
User avatar
By Yudster
#399535
When something is that revolting I don't tend to bother tasting it again.
#399574
Beadle Poke wrote:
foot-loose wrote:Marjorie Dawes is funny though. The League of Gentlemen was not. Not in the slightest.

It irritates me that when I TELL people who liked it that I thought the League of Gentlemen was gash, they sort of look down on me in a "bless the little person who doesn't understand comedy" sort of way. Wankers.


I know exactly what they mean. People who hate the log either didn't give it a chance, or just can't see the dimension of comedy that league lovers can. It's a shame you haters don't get it, but what do you expect when you're all soooo 'egregious' yeah - go and google that one you fat old has been.

I gave it a chance. This "dimension of comedy" you speak of is another way of phrasing "finding shite funny". It's ok though, you can use a big word. That makes you better than others ya leaky mingebox.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#399597
Well, who'da thunk it - comedy being subjective?!
#399608
Beadle Poke wrote:People who like the log are intelligent, successful and sexy 20 something men and women

Really? Most of the people I know who like it take too many drugs. They are good mates, but I wouldn't call them sexy.

Comedy is subjective. I don't class "the log" (the description of which makes me think of a perfectly formed turd - how apt) as comedy. It's shite.
User avatar
By Zoot
#399613
See I found League of Gentlemen funny. It's not your usual 'laugh out loud/slapstick funny but it's brilliantly surreal.
And Psychoville is excellent (apart from the last episode, which was rushed, confusing and shite.)
User avatar
By Yudster
#399633
I suppose subjective is the word. I don't know if League of Gentlemen is well written or funny or not, but I don't care. Telly is there to make me feel happy, and just looking at that programme makes me feel revolted. I'll happily take anyone's word for it being funny, but its just telly, and if looking at it makes me go "eeeew" then I'll do something else.
#399656
I find it a bit of a curate's egg. There were some lovely sketches that blended humour (sight gags, paradox) with pathos (Mark Gatiss especially) but then spoilt by sketches which were downright 'dark' for the sake of it (bleeding noses etc.). The grotesque characterisations were absolutely essential to the brand of humour but even I found some of the images unecessarily icky (explicit suckling -haha-oh-christ-yuck!). The repeated crowd-pleasing appearence of PapaLazarou were a bit contrived (during their live shows the audiences would cheer at the mere sight of him, before anything funny was said - bloody stoodents). This was also all during that era where 'dark comedy' was seen as the future by commisioners and so displaced the more traditional/mainstream comedy enjoyed (and missed) by wider audiences. Unfortunately many of these writers thought that audiences could be shocked into laughter purely by presenting depressing/discomforting situations instead of actual 'jokes'.
User avatar
By Yudster
#399669
Lactating Man Nips wrote:Unfortunately many of these writers thought that audiences could be shocked into laughter purely by presenting depressing/discomforting situations instead of actual 'jokes'.

Never going to work for me. I don't watch telly to be shocked, depressed or made uncomfortable - I watch telly to have a break from the stuff which does those things.
User avatar
By Yudster
#399687
I like bones. I bet you do too. You shadup.
#399723
League Of Gentleman was hit and miss for me,when it was good it was great when it was bad it was rubbish and in parts revolving.The film was laughable and not in a good way.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#399812
foot-loose wrote:The Far Side.

Now that is genius.

Image
User avatar
By Yudster
#399920
Yes.
  • 1
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17