The place where everyone hangs out, chats, gossips, and argues
By dougiem32
#313608
Hey chris,

you were a * disgrace to children in need tonight, esp focusing on the way u treated jeremy and terry in the opposing team in the mock buzzcock special, you TOTALLY RUINED IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

and in my book, your a dead man walking....better hope i never bump into you.............
User avatar
By Sunny So Cal
#313609
Certainly there's a prescription for your anger issues? Seek medical help, dougie. In addition, let me direct your attention to the following>>>

http://chrismoyles.net/mw/contact.shtml
We would like to make you aware that chrismoyles.net is not maintained nor authorised by Chris Moyles or by anyone acting on his behalf. The site is a loss making venture maintained purely for the enjoyment of Chris' fans - not for profit. Please understand these facts before contacting us.
We disclaim all responsibility for the information contained within this site. If we ever create a 'please jump off a bridge' page we dont' expect you to do it. You use this site at your own risk. If through visiting this site you are invaded by small green men, it wasn't us.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#313612
Why was he a disgrace? OK it wasn't very good, but I don't understand why he was a disgrace.
User avatar
By Andy B
#313614
Haven't watched it yet, recorded it last night as I was in the pub watching the footy last night but it'll be the first thing I look for tonight when I get in!

I love it when Moyles slags off Wogan.
User avatar
By Andy B
#313616
Ooh, just a point, what time was it on so I can just skip straight to it without having to sit through all the boring bits? Roughly will do.
User avatar
By Andy B
#313619
Hang on a tic
The ChrisMoyles.net rules and info thingy wrote:If we ever create a 'please jump off a bridge' page we dont' expect you to do it. You use this site at your own risk. If through visiting this site you are invaded by small green men, it wasn't us.

How long has that been there? Is that official, can you actually disclaim against that?
By David
#313620
It was awful and very unfunny. It didn't help that whoever was doing the sound for the piece should be sacked.

You know something isn't good when you have to finish up describing it by saying, "the funniest bit about it was Jo Brand"
User avatar
By Andy B
#313621
It all went wrong from the moment that "Jospeh" guy started singing and they had to rush a stage hand on with a radio mike and then again to turn it on for him. Pissed myself at that bit. I thought to myself "this bodes well for a well organised live show!"
User avatar
By Console
#313624
David wrote:You know something isn't good when you have to finish up describing it by saying, "the funniest bit about it was Jo Brand"


I've just finished watching it and I have to agree, sadly. I've never actually found Jo Brand funny before, so it was either in contrast that I found her funny, or it was all the script.

I don't think they should do a live, uncut NMTB again.

Topher wrote:Why was he a disgrace? OK it wasn't very good, but I don't understand why he was a disgrace.


I also can't see why Moyles could be described as a disgrace. He wasn't rude, or over-the-top; hell, he barely said anything to the other team. I though Wogan was more of a 'disgrace'.
User avatar
By Sunny So Cal
#313625
Andy B wrote:Hang on a tic
The ChrisMoyles.net rules and info thingy wrote:If we ever create a 'please jump off a bridge' page we dont' expect you to do it. You use this site at your own risk. If through visiting this site you are invaded by small green men, it wasn't us.

How long has that been there? Is that official, can you actually disclaim against that?


Is CM.net just indemnifying against small GREEN men? Isn't that racist? Erm, colorist? So, small purple men suddenly ricocheting about your home, for instance are OK and WAS related to the site?

And, I stand by my initial assertion -- even if Moyles was rubbish on the show, he wouldn't be a "disgrace" and doesn't deserve strange threat by even stranger man.
User avatar
By maximus
#313639
dougiem32 wrote:Hey chris,

you were a * disgrace to children in need tonight, esp focusing on the way u treated jeremy and terry in the opposing team in the mock buzzcock special, you TOTALLY RUINED IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

and in my book, your a dead man walking....better hope i never bump into you.............


Get a grip.
User avatar
By catherine
#313670
Terry Wogan was a disgrace, he acted like a stroppy 4 year old and it wasn't funny. Chris just looked like he was bored to death.
User avatar
By foot-loose
#313691
Terry Wogan will never be a disgrace. The man is a legend, a genius and well hung to boot.

He might be a complete disaster, but that means nothing.
User avatar
By Yudster
#313707
dougiem32 wrote:Hey chris,

you were a * disgrace to children in need tonight, esp focusing on the way u treated jeremy and terry in the opposing team in the mock buzzcock special, you TOTALLY RUINED IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

and in my book, your a dead man walking....better hope i never bump into you.............


You're funny. Funnier than Buzzcocks. And I don't like or support Children In Need at all, what are you going to do to me if you bump into me?
User avatar
By Andy B
#313714
I'm quite curious as to what the '32' represents in his username, I can't believe he's 75 years old nor that he's 32 (unless he were a retarded 32 year old) maybe it's his IQ?
User avatar
By foot-loose
#313735
Well, they raised over £19 million on Friday and over £30 million last year for kids.

Id say that regardless of your opinion of the night, it certainly has a good purpose.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#313748
Andy B wrote:I'm quite curious as to what the '32' represents in his username, I can't believe he's 75 years old nor that he's 32 (unless he were a retarded 32 year old) maybe it's his IQ?

Maybe there are 31 people with "dougiem" at the start of their username.
User avatar
By Sunny So Cal
#313756
32 & counting unsuccessful lobotomies?

If someone gives up their personal time & effort to show up & support a worthy cause they should be commended for it -- not sat down & had their baws kicked in. That's a lot of money raised and all involved should be patted on the back not denigrated.
User avatar
By Yudster
#313759
foot-loose wrote:Well, they raised over £19 million on Friday and over £30 million last year for kids.

Id say that regardless of your opinion of the night, it certainly has a good purpose.


I'd agree with that. Perhaps its not true to say I don't "like" Children In Need, because it clearly has a big and positive impact on certain projects and charities, and for the most part, that has to be a good thing. My reasons for not supporting it are that I prefer to organise my charity giving on an annual basis, and give money to specific causes (actually one of them isn't a charity at all) via a Gift Aid direct debit, apparently this is a more cost-effective way of donating, and the charity can claim back tax or something complicated like that. Also, CiN and other telethon type collections are giving money to a huge range of charities, some of which I actually don't want to support (not because I don't like what they are doing, but sometimes, I don't agree with the way they do it).
User avatar
By Vivienne
#313799
I didn't see Children In Need. I switched over (briefly), saw Victoria Beckham's face, was gripped by a sudden RAGE, and switched back off. I was watching "Entrapment" with Sean Connery on Friday eve., which was GREAT.
User avatar
By Console
#313805
Viv 113 wrote:I didn't see Children In Need. I switched over (briefly)


I didn't watch it live, but I got it off of Nova and managed to watch the entire thing in about 30 mins. The Doctor Who thing was pretty much the only worthwhile thing on it, although the Hotel Babylon bit was good as well.
User avatar
By Yudster
#313807
Moyles was talking about the Buzzcocks bit this morning - I laughed when Dom said that he could see Chris, about halfway through, mentally disassociate himself from the whole debacle!
User avatar
By foot-loose
#313818
Viv 113 wrote:I didn't see Children In Need. I switched over (briefly), saw Victoria Beckham's face, was gripped by a sudden RAGE, and switched back off. I was watching "Entrapment" with Sean Connery on Friday eve., which was GREAT.

I love the RANDOM words that get capitalised in vivs POSTS.

I always think it makes her seem less stable. Imagine that every word that is capitalised is SHOUTED!



My favourite is TESCOS!! AAARGGGHHH!!!

Friday is up, and platinum: https://archive.org/d[…]