The place where everyone hangs out, chats, gossips, and argues
User avatar
By Vivienne
#288749
there's a good point!!
User avatar
By DemonHorse
#288750
Yudster wrote:
DemonHorse wrote:then again she kept drinking and partying when she was first pregnant so a dumbass move like that shouldn't surprise me. Look what it did to her poor kid though.


Is that true, or are you assuming? There's a lot of things can go wrong with a pregnancy which don't have anything to do with the lifestyle of the mother - and thats even before you get to the genetic possibilities. But is Harvey's condition down to Katie's behaviour?


I'm sure there was a news report where doctors had actually attributed Harvey's condition 'mostly' to her continued partying etc.

Bex does also make a good point. When it comes to publicity, Jordan (or if not her, probably her agent) are smarter than this.
Last edited by DemonHorse on Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
By Ballbag
#288751
~bex~ wrote:I think he absolutely did the right thing, but a cynical part of me worries that Jordan and her "people" pulled this whole stunt on purpose, knowing how much publicity Gest got when he didn't turn up.



Ooooh you're making dangerous accusations there. But I totally agree. The ammount of publicity she'll get for not turning up will be MUCH greater than if she'd turned up. Her book was mentioned on the show alot today and so achieved her aim, and now it'll be in all of the papers tomorrow.
It wouldn't surprise me if it was a collaboration between Moyles and Jordan. Afterall his show will be in all of the papers tomorrow as well, not that I'm suggesting anything of the sort actually goes on of course.
User avatar
By claradooblue
#288752
I'm not sure about that. They might have pulled that stunt if they felt that Katie Price was going to let herself down/embarress herself on Chris' show. However, she's shown before that she comes across quite well. So publicity from appearing would probably be better for her than the publicity of not appearing.
User avatar
By foot-loose
#288753
While you may be tight* BFB, the other side of the coin would be that if Moyles wasn't in on it, he might be a bit peed off if he thought he was being used like that without knowing about it. She could jepordise getting on his show again?



*that is meant to say "right" but I didn't correct myself coz it made me smile.
By Ballbag
#288754
I wouldn't say that there's no such thing as bad publicity, but you do have to go very far to acheive it (Jade, Jo and Danielle Lloyd etc etc) but even that can be spun into something good. This whole shi-bang will work out very well for Jordan, and indeed Chris Moyles........ everyone wins.
User avatar
By DemonHorse
#288757
Bag for balls wrote:I wouldn't say that there's no such thing as bad publicity, but you do have to go very far to acheive it (Jade, Jo and Danielle Lloyd etc etc) but even that can be spun into something good. This whole shi-bang will work out very well for Jordan, and indeed Chris Moyles........ everyone wins.


DemonHorse wrote:When it comes to publicity, Jordan (or if not her, probably her agent) are smarter than this.
User avatar
By Yudster
#288761
To summarise - Bag for Balls said Moyles and Jordan pulled a publicity stunt.
User avatar
By Vivienne
#288762
I'm often surprised Jordan would fit into any radio studio.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#288763
Yudster wrote:I like your hair too Topher.

Thanks, but isn't this in the wrong thread?
By Ballbag
#288764
Yudster wrote:To summarise - Bag for Balls said Moyles and Jordan pulled a publicity stunt.


No he didn't, they don't exist. He merely implied that it could happen, obviously there's the possibility, but they never happen.
User avatar
By Vivienne
#288766
Topher wrote:
Yudster wrote:I like your hair too Topher.

Thanks, but isn't this in the wrong thread?


I don't like your hair :lol:
User avatar
By Yudster
#288767
Topher wrote:
Yudster wrote:I like your hair too Topher.

Thanks, but isn't this in the wrong thread?


It was reciprocal niceness. And its never inappropriate to admire someone's hair. Unless its horrible, of course.
User avatar
By MK Chris
#288770
Ah in which case - thanks!
User avatar
By Nicola_Red
#288801
DemonHorse wrote:
Yudster wrote:
DemonHorse wrote:then again she kept drinking and partying when she was first pregnant so a dumbass move like that shouldn't surprise me. Look what it did to her poor kid though.


Is that true, or are you assuming? There's a lot of things can go wrong with a pregnancy which don't have anything to do with the lifestyle of the mother - and thats even before you get to the genetic possibilities. But is Harvey's condition down to Katie's behaviour?


I'm sure there was a news report where doctors had actually attributed Harvey's condition 'mostly' to her continued partying etc.


Can’t believe I’m defending Jordan of all people but this is just not true. Harvey was born with a condition called septo-optic dysplasia which basically means that he was born blind. He has the more severe form which also includes mental retardation and pituitary gland malfunction (explains his unusually large size). There’s no know cause of septo-optic dysplasia - both healthy and unhealthy mothers have given birth to babies with the condition. It’s basically a random birth defect.
Last edited by Nicola_Red on Tue Jun 05, 2007 12:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
By Ballbag
#288802
Hmmm, favourable mentions for both Chris and Jordan already in the papers? Now if only they'd planned this.
User avatar
By Vivienne
#288803
nicola_red wrote:
DemonHorse wrote:
Yudster wrote:
DemonHorse wrote:then again she kept drinking and partying when she was first pregnant so a dumbass move like that shouldn't surprise me. Look what it did to her poor kid though.


Is that true, or are you assuming? There's a lot of things can go wrong with a pregnancy which don't have anything to do with the lifestyle of the mother - and thats even before you get to the genetic possibilities. But is Harvey's condition down to Katie's behaviour?


I'm sure there was a news report where doctors had actually attributed Harvey's condition 'mostly' to her continued partying etc.


Can’t believe I’m defending Jordan of all people but this is just not true. Harvey was born with a condition called septo-optic dysplasia which basically means that he was born blind. He has the more severe form which also includes mental retardation and pituitary gland malfunction (explains his unusually large size). There’s no know cause of septo-optic dysplasia - both healthy and unhealthy mothers have given birth to babies with the condition. It’s basically a random birth defect.


Well said.
User avatar
By DemonHorse
#288806
Mcqueen_ wrote:http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2004 ... 24,00.html

Katie and her manager have commented on it.

Good on him though.


and already I find a problem with the very first sentence
Sun's Cretin Journo wrote:RADIO One star CHRIS MOYLES launched a furious on-air attack on JORDAN this morning - and banned her from his show for being late.


Wrong, just didn't let her on THIS show. I'm sure Moyles said a few times she's NOT banned, Idiot.
User avatar
By timp
#288871
That story in the Sun makes me feel so angry and it proves the worthlessness of the Sun in general.
User avatar
By Yudster
#288874
I liked the made-up "comments from readers" underneath.
User avatar
By timp
#288875
Dont get me started Yudster! Demonhorse the first mistake comes before the one you spotted 'the furious attack on Jordan' was actually on her PR. And then it goes on....
User avatar
By DemonHorse
#288923
hmmm that's a VERY good point Timp. Guess we were both obviously listening more closely than that hack at the Sun though. :P
User avatar
By timp
#288930
Katie was only 15 minutes late for the show


Rubbish. Try half an hour.